<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Moving Forward &#187; Science &amp; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.larrylaw.net/category/science-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.larrylaw.net</link>
	<description>Here we go.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:26:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Blu-ray vs DVD</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2012/01/23/blu-ra-vs-dvd/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2012/01/23/blu-ra-vs-dvd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blu-ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dvd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.larrylaw.net/?p=564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every once in a while I will rent a Blu-ray disc from Netflix to compare it to a DVD that I already own.  The idea is if the Blu-ray quality is significantly better I might replace the DVD.  For movies that I truly treasure, I might want to evaluate the Blu-ray extra features for the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a while I will rent a Blu-ray disc from <a title="Netflix" href="http://netflix.com">Netflix</a> to compare it to a DVD that I already own.  The idea is if the Blu-ray quality is significantly better I might replace the DVD.  For movies that I truly treasure, I might want to evaluate the Blu-ray extra features for the same reason.  Well, I have yet to find a single title that I would plunk down $20 to upgrade.  Every Blu-ray disc is better than DVD &#8212; better picture, better sound and sometimes even better extras &#8212; but they are not <em>significantly</em> better.  That is why it is going to take Blu-ray a little longer to replace DVD than it did for DVD to wipe out VHS, or CD to push vinyle out of the mainstream.  To dislodge an established technology the new technology must be several orders of magnitude better, not just a little better.  Compact discs provide the best example  &#8211; music fans went out immediately and replaced their extensive vinyl catalogs with new CDs.  Not so with Blu-ray &#8212; my old Godfather DVD isn&#8217;t going anywhere for now.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I the motivation for this post was that I rented <em><a title="Stop Making Sense (Wikipedia)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Making_Sense">Stop Making Sense</a></em> on Blu-ray this weekend &#8212; it is a great, great movie on DVD or Blu-ray.  In fact, it was the first DVD that I ever bought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2012/01/23/blu-ra-vs-dvd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How I Manage a Large, Diverse iTunes Library (Updated)</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/10/25/how-i-manage-a-large-diverse-itunes-library/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/10/25/how-i-manage-a-large-diverse-itunes-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 20:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrylaw.net/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have nearly 10,000 tracks in my iTunes library.  It is a diverse collection that includes my personal music, my family&#8217;s music, audiobooks, some old time radio, podcasts, educational materials and so on.  If I just synced this all as a blob to my iPod it would not be very useful to me &#8212; I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have nearly 10,000 tracks in my<a title="iTunes" href="http://itunes.com"> iTunes</a> library.  It is a diverse collection that includes my personal music, my family&#8217;s music, audiobooks, some old time radio, podcasts, educational materials and so on.  If I just synced this all as a blob to my iPod it would not be very useful to me &#8212; I would basically have to listen to music the old fashioned way, an album at a time.  Also I don&#8217;t have time to painstakingly craft the perfect manual playlist like I did in the vinyl days of my youth (cassettes with less than 10 seconds of dead space, and typed playlists).</p>
<p>To make my collection useful I make heavy use of the library management tools built into iTunes, primarily <a title="iTunes Smart Playlists (Apple)" href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1801">Smart Playlists</a>.  My basic goal is to separate stuff that I listen to regularly (my music), from stuff that I might listen to rarely or not at all (everything else).  Here are the basics of my methodology:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Encode everything!</strong> Don&#8217;t waste your time trying to edit your collection as you encode your CDs.  <a title="External Hard Drives (Amazon)" href="http://www.amazon.com/External-Hard-Drives-Storage-Add-Ons/b?ie=UTF8&amp;node=595048">Hard drive space is cheap</a>, and it is much easier to filter a track out of your library than to go back and encode it later should you want to.</li>
<li>Take the time to organize, rate, and categorize everything.  It takes time, but you don&#8217;t have to do it all at once.  I keep a couple of Smart Playlists with tracks that have not been rated or categorized into genres.  I also have some manual playlists with stuff that needs my attention (such as duplicates).  I find it useful to keep the album artwork up to date too (more on that later).</li>
<li>I have two playlists of music that I want to exclude from my music library.  There is manual playlist (<strong>Manual Exclude</strong>) that contains stuff like my wife&#8217;s music (most of it, anyway), my kids&#8217; music, spoken word content and so on.  There is also a Smart Playlist (<strong>Exclude</strong>) that includes the <strong>Manual Exclude</strong> playlist, plus a few categories that I don&#8217;t want to bother with: video, podcasts, tracks with fewer than three stars and so on.</li>
<li><strong>My Music</strong> is a Smart Playlist that includes everything that is <em>not</em> in my <strong>Exclude</strong> playlist.</li>
<li>Most of my other &#8220;core&#8221; playlists are Smart Playlists built on <strong>My Music </strong>(the first condition in the Smart Playlist is &#8220;playlist is My Music&#8221;):  Most Played, Least Played, Not Recently Played, Top Rated, Favorites (Most Played + Top Rated), and so on.  I then build smaller playlists from these core lists.</li>
<li>The only time I really use manual playlists (other than in my initial setup) is when I create an On The Go playlists from some tracks or albums that may be on my mind as I&#8217;m listening my iPod.</li>
<li>I sync everything over to my primary iPod (classic), and stick with my  core playlists and their derivatives, unless I&#8217;m just in the mood for a particular album, artist or genre.  For the Shuffle (treadmill or lawn work), I just take a sample of one my core playlists.</li>
<li><strong>Multiple Libraries</strong>:  iTunes supports <a title="iTunes multiple libraries (Apple)" href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=iTunesMac/8.0/en/15499.html">multiple libraries</a> and I make use of them.  I have a second library that I maintain for my wife.  She has her own playlists, play counts, ratings and so on.</li>
<li>Finally, this may sound a little silly, but I also make use of the album artwork screen saver on my computer.  You would be surprised how often I see something pop up on the screen that just happens to strike my fancy that day.  It is a good way to uncover stuff that might get lost or neglected in a large library.</li>
</ol>
<p>I hope someone finds this useful.  Let me know if you have any other tips.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/10/25/how-i-manage-a-large-diverse-itunes-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kindle Review &#8211; Updated</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/06/16/kindle-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/06/16/kindle-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrylaw.net/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently finished my first book on my shiny new Kindle DX.  (The book was Chronicles, Vol. I by Bob Dylan &#8212; it probably merits its own review if I can find the time.)  How does the DX measure up to its dead tree counterparts?  Quite well.  It is a perfectly acceptable substitute for a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently finished my first book on my shiny new <a title="Kindle DX" href="http://www.amazon.com/Kindle-DX-Amazons-Wireless-Generation/dp/B0015TCML0">Kindle DX</a>.  (The book was <a title="Chronicles, Vol. I (Amazon)" href="http://www.amazon.com/Chronicles-One-Bob-Dylan/dp/0743244583/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1246131667&amp;sr=8-1">Chronicles, Vol. I</a> by Bob Dylan &#8212; it probably merits its own review if I can find the time.)  How does the DX measure up to its dead tree counterparts?  Quite well.  It is a perfectly acceptable substitute for a traditional book &#8212; if, and it is a big if &#8212; you are reading the book cover-to-cover.  So the Kindle works well for a novel or piece of nonfiction that you read from page one straight through.  However, the Kindle seems less useful for reference books, or any type of work that you might want to skim-and-scan &#8212; the searching and linking features are just a bit clunky.  This is not an insurmountable problem and I am sure it will be solved as the device evolves.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t had you hands on a Kindle, let me just say that the display is jaw-dropping.  When I showed it around many of my friends and colleagues could hardly believe they were looking at an electronic display.  The text and images are crystal clear.  This makes reading with the Kindle very easy on the eyes &#8212; no eyestrain or headaches like you might have with reading a lot of text on backlit LCD devices (I&#8217;m looking in your direction, iPhone).  The larger form-factor of the DX is also nice &#8212; the smaller Kindle is a little dinky in my opinion.</p>
<p>Another minor flaw is the noticeable 1/8 second hiccup as you turn the page in a document.  This is a little distracting, especially if you have your hands  on a real page-turner (like Dylan&#8217;s book, by the way).  Again, this is something that seems like it could be improved in future releases.</p>
<p>I also should also point out that the native PDF support is hit-or-miss.  Since PDF is a page layout standard, the Kindle does not give you any way to reformat the document (font size, paging and so on).  So  some PDFs look great, and others are completely unreadable.  This is disappointing because I envisioned myself downloading a lot of technical documentation which is freely available in PDF.  Some of those sources look fine, but it depends on how the original document is formatted.  However, my primary intention with PDF is to convert plain text documents  (such as <a title="Project Gutenberg" href="http://www.gutenberg.org">Gutenberg</a> texts) into PDF .  This works just fine and gives me a virtually unlimited source of free literature.</p>
<p>So the Kindle is great for most books, but I cannot say the same for newspapers.  Again the problem is in how I am used to reading the paper:  I scan, find an article,  read it, scan some more, skim an article, read part of an article, abandon an uninteresting article, scan and skim some more, and so on.  The Kindle just doesn&#8217;t support this style of reading.  I suppose I need to keep at it.  I have about a year&#8217;s worth of free 2-week trial subscriptions to get accustomed to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/06/16/kindle-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fun with Flock</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/04/02/fun-with-flock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/04/02/fun-with-flock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrylaw.net/2009/04/02/fun-with-flock/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am creating this post with Flock&#8217;s blog editor.  If you haven&#8217;t tried Flock you might want to give it a look.  It is a Firefox-based browser with tons of nifty Web 2.0-ish features built in.  I can manage my RSS feeds, my Flickr account, my WordPress blog, my Tweets and all other sorts of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am creating this post with Flock&#8217;s blog editor.  If you haven&#8217;t tried <a href="http://flock.com">Flock</a> you might want to give it a look.  It is a <a href="http://mozilla.org/firefox">Firefox</a>-based browser with tons of nifty Web 2.0-ish features built in.  I can manage my RSS feeds, my <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/larrylaw">Flickr</a> account, my <a href="http://www.larrylaw.net">WordPress blog</a>, my <a href="http://twitter.com/larrylaw">Tweets</a> and all other sorts of useless, productivity-killing stuff.</p>
<div class="flockcredit" style="text-align: right; color: #CCC; font-size: x-small;">Blogged with the <a style="color: #999; font-weight: bold;" title="Flock Browser" href="http://www.flock.com/blogged-with-flock" target="_new">Flock Browser</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/04/02/fun-with-flock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>QuickTime Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/01/11/quicktime-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/01/11/quicktime-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bargain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quicktime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrylaw.net/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you just want to do some quick video cropping, transcoding and basic reformatting, it is hard to beat Apple&#8217;s QuickTime Pro for $30. I am speaking of the Mac version; I don&#8217;t really have any firsthand experience with the Windows version.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you just want to do some quick video cropping, transcoding and basic reformatting, it is hard to beat Apple&#8217;s <a title="QuickTime Pro (Apple)" href="http://www.apple.com/quicktime/pro/">QuickTime Pro</a> for $30.  I am speaking of the Mac version; I don&#8217;t really have any firsthand experience with the Windows version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2009/01/11/quicktime-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iWeek</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2008/08/24/iweek/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2008/08/24/iweek/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 21:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family & Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rambling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrylaw.net/wordpress/?p=71</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iMillie:  Our little princess turned 1 this week.  Happy birthday, girl girl! iMow: The Shuffle came up with another good mix of mowing tunes: &#8220;Kaitie&#8217;s Been Gone&#8221;; The Band &#8220;Can&#8217;t Buy Me Love&#8221;, &#8220;Norwegian Wood&#8221;, &#8220;Roll Over Beethoven&#8221;; The Beatles &#8220;Masters of War&#8221;; Bob Dylan &#8220;Young Americans&#8221;; David Bowie &#8220;This Year&#8217;s Girl&#8221;, Elvis Costello &#8220;Lost Highway&#8221;; Hank [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>iMillie:</strong>  Our <a title="Millie (Flickr)" href="http://flickri.com/photos/larrylaw/tags/millie">little princess</a> turned 1 this week.  Happy birthday, girl girl!</p>
<p><strong>iMow: </strong>The Shuffle came up with another good mix of mowing tunes:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8220;Kaitie&#8217;s Been Gone&#8221;; The Band</li>
<li>&#8220;Can&#8217;t Buy Me Love&#8221;, &#8220;Norwegian Wood&#8221;, &#8220;Roll Over Beethoven&#8221;; The Beatles</li>
<li>&#8220;Masters of War&#8221;; Bob Dylan</li>
<li>&#8220;Young Americans&#8221;; David Bowie</li>
<li>&#8220;This Year&#8217;s Girl&#8221;, Elvis Costello</li>
<li>&#8220;Lost Highway&#8221;; Hank Williams</li>
<li>&#8220;What Do You Do/The Glory of Love&#8221;; Lyle Lovett and His Large Band</li>
<li>&#8220;Sunny Side of the Mountain&#8221;; The Nitty Gritty Dirt Band</li>
<li>&#8220;Private Joy&#8221;; Prince</li>
<li>&#8220;Enlightenment&#8221;; Van Morrison</li>
<li>&#8220;The Kids Are Alright&#8221;, The Who</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>iDrink:  </strong><a title="Stovepipe Porter" href="http://www.ottercreekbrewing.com/otter_creek/beers/Stovepipe_Porter.html">Stovepipe Porter</a>, Otter Creek Brewing</p>
<p><strong>iMac</strong>:  I retired my old Dell this week and replaced it with an <a title="iMac (Apple)" href="http://apple.com/imac">iMac</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2008/08/24/iweek/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trying OpenDNS</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2008/08/09/trying-opendns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2008/08/09/trying-opendns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenDNS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrylaw.net/wordpress/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The recently revealed DNS security flaw prompted me to switch to OpenDNS (which is not vulnerable to the problem).  So far so good.  The DNS lookups are speedy, though I have not noticed it being substantially faster than my ISP&#8217;s DNS. OpenDNS is free and using it is as simple as changing the DNS settings [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="OpenDNS" href="http://opendns.com"><img class="alignleft" style="margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px;" src="http://www.opendns.com/img/logo/opendns_logo_100.gif" alt="OpenDNS" /></a> The recently revealed <a title="Dan Kaminksy (Wikipedia)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Kaminsky">DNS security flaw</a> prompted me to switch to <a title="OpenDNS" href="http://opendns.com">OpenDNS</a> (which is not vulnerable to the problem).  So far so good.  The DNS lookups are speedy, though I have not noticed it being substantially faster than my ISP&#8217;s DNS.</p>
<p>OpenDNS is free and using it is as simple as changing the DNS settings in your computer or your router to use the OpenDNS servers.  They make their money from displaying ads and a search page for failed lookups.  If you sign up for an OpenDNS account and register your IP address, you can take advantage of some extra features such as usage stats and content blocking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2008/08/09/trying-opendns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Me &amp; My iPod</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2008/07/20/me-my-ipod/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2008/07/20/me-my-ipod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrylaw.net/wordpress/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A colleague of mine recently told me about his plans to buy a 32 GB iPod Touch so he could load all of his music on it.  All of his music? An iPod of that size would not have nearly enough storage to hold all of my music, and this friend is a serious music [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A colleague of mine recently told me about his plans to buy a 32 GB iPod Touch so he could load all of his music on it.  <em>All of his music?</em> An iPod of that size would not have nearly enough storage to hold all of my music, and this friend is a serious music fan who &#8212; to be polite &#8212; has been listening to music a lot longer than me.</p>
<p>&#8220;How can you possibly get all of your music on an iPod that size?&#8221;, I asked.</p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t rip the CDs that I never listen to, and I don&#8217;t rip all of the songs on every CD.&#8221;</p>
<p>As he explained further, I began to realize that he basically used his iPod to listen to music in just about the same way that he did before he had an iPod &#8212; it was just a different medium for listening to music: he saw it as a replacement for the CD, just as the CD had replaced tape and just as tape had replaced vinyl.</p>
<p>That inspired me to begin to think about how dramatically the iPod and digital music has changed how I enjoy my music collection.  First let&#8217;s return to my buddy&#8217;s process of culling his music library prior to ripping his CDs.  Had I done that, I would never have rediscovered tons of great music from more than two decades of collecting CDs.  The most outstanding example is <em>Anthology</em>, the greatest hits of Sly &amp; the Family Stone.  I probably hadn&#8217;t popped that CD into my player in more than 10 years.  But one day &#8216;Everyday People&#8217; just happened to show up during a random song shuffle on my iPod, and now Sly shows up just about every week in my play lists.  That just wouldn&#8217;t have happened without the iPod.</p>
<p>The iPod has also made it easier for me to sample and buy new music.  For example, the music recommendation engines used by the digital music stores have led me to some terrific music.  As a fan of Elvis Costello and Lyle Lovett, iTunes and Amazon began to recommend the music of John Hiatt.  I downloaded a few songs by Hiatt and quickly got hooked on his stuff.  Again, this is not really possible with traditional music stores.  To a lesser extent I have also pulled into some of my wife&#8217;s music into my regular rotation &#8212; I probably never would have grabbed one of her CDs, but it was not a big deal to bring in a few Aimee Mann or Annie Lennox tracks into my play lists.</p>
<p>I could go on and on, but I&#8217;ll finish up with how the iPod has opened up the world non-musical audio.  I listen to a lot of podcasts &#8212; news and tech mostly.  Podcasts, obviously, would not be feasible without the marriage of broadband Internet, RSS, and portable digital audio players.  I also have begun listening to a lot of old time radio on my iPod.  I&#8217;m sure that <a title="Jack Benny (Wikipedia)" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Benny">Jack Benny</a> had no idea back in the 1930&#8242;s that I would be able to store three decades worth of his programs on a gadget the size of a deck of cards (with room to spare).</p>
<p>So if you are using your iPod the same way that you used the 8-track player in your old Pinto, you&#8217;re really missing out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2008/07/20/me-my-ipod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Review: Amazon MP3 Downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2007/09/25/review-amazon-mp3-downloads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2007/09/25/review-amazon-mp3-downloads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 00:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts & Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrylaw.net/wordpress/?p=35</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today Amazon began offering high-quality, DRM-free MP3 downloads from two of the major music studios. I decided to give it a try. I fired up my Powerbook and installed Amazon&#8217;s free downloader. Installing a separate downloader sounds like a pain, but it is a very slick tool. You can buy an entire MP3 album with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today <a href="http://amazon.com" title="Amazon">Amazon</a> began offering high-quality, DRM-free MP3 downloads from two of the major music studios.  I decided to give it a try.  I fired up my Powerbook and installed Amazon&#8217;s free downloader.  Installing a separate downloader sounds like a pain, but it is a very slick tool.  You can buy an entire MP3 album with Amazon&#8217;s <a href="http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=5960411" title="Amazon's One-Click">One-Click</a> using your favorite browser, and then the downloader automatically pulls all the files down, copies them to your iTunes folder and imports the tracks into your iTunes library (including the album art).  <em>Fancy.</em></p>
<p>With much of the EMI and Universal catalogs available, the selection of music is excellent.  I bought Sinatra&#8217;s classic <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_the_Wee_Small_Hours" title="In the Wee Small Hours"><em>In the Wee Small Hours</em></a> (1954) for $8.99 (also available at $0.89 per track).  <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/franksinatra" title="Frank Sinatra (Rolling Stone)">Frank</a> never sounded better  &#8212; this is the 1998 remastered version, and the MP3s are encoded at 256 VBR.</p>
<p>Is this an <a href="http://itunes.com" title="iTunes">iTunes</a> killer?  Too soon to say, but this is an awfully impressive debut &#8212; the price is better than iTunes and the quality is superb.  I still prefer CDs, but if I am in the mood for a quick impulse buy, I now have two viable alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2007/09/25/review-amazon-mp3-downloads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Phone Number</title>
		<link>http://www.larrylaw.net/2007/07/14/new-phone-number/</link>
		<comments>http://www.larrylaw.net/2007/07/14/new-phone-number/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 16:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>larry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family & Friends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larrylaw.net/wordpress/?p=27</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our 2-year wireless-only experiment is over. The Cingular (now AT&#38;T Wireless) network is not reliable enough to use as our primary telephone.  We had just too many dropped calls. You just can&#8217;t top the rock solid-reliability of the traditional phone network. We are keeping AT&#38;T for our two wireless phones (upgrading to the RAZR), so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our 2-year wireless-only experiment is over.  The Cingular (now <a href="http://www.wireless.att.com" title="AT&amp;T Wireless">AT&amp;T Wireless</a>) network is not reliable enough to use as our primary telephone.  We had just too many dropped calls.  You just can&#8217;t top the rock solid-reliability of the <a href="http://www.verizon.com" title="Verizon">traditional phone network</a>.</p>
<p>We are keeping AT&amp;T for our two wireless phones (upgrading to the <a href="https://www.motorola.com/motoinfo/product/details.jsp?globalObjectId=69" title="Motorola RAZR">RAZR</a>), so the numbers will be the same.  However, we will  be getting a new home number this week.  I will email the new number to our friends and family as soon as it is active.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.larrylaw.net/2007/07/14/new-phone-number/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

